The Very Very Very Very Late Patristics Carnival 33

Patristics Carnival XXXIII

Sorry for posting this so late, but good news is I did end up finding a lot more posts, so that’s good!

Here’s who’s blogging on the Church Mothers and Fathers:

Al Kimel blogged on St-Isaac-the-Syrian-preaching-the-astonishing-love-of-god/

and  the-scandalous-injustice-of-god/

and love-and-the-punishment-of-evil/

as well as the-hellish-scourge-of-divine-love/

and the-triumph-of-the-kingdom-over-gehenna/

and lastly, the good-news-and-bad-news: all-are-saved-satan-too/

Amanda Mac reviewed Did-the-first-christians-worship-Jesus?

Amanda Mac on the Apostles’ Creed and-what-really-matters/

As well as her tips-for-practicing-lectio-divina

 William Varner on Millenialism In the Didache

Joe Carter asks, Are environmentalists the modern-Gnostics?

Jim Davila on Gnosticism on the Radio

Fr. John Zuhlsdorf  asks Have-we-entered-an-age-of-a-new-gnosticism?

Ryan Clevenger on Principles-for-Patristics-10: the-specter-of-influence

Andrew-Louth-on-Christianity-and-Neoplatonism

April DeConick on the New Athena font

Roger Pearse on Cyril of Alexandria and Ingesting the Godhead as a dubious-quote

Mark-Sheridan-on the-homilies-of-Rufus-of-Shotep/

Larry Hurtado reviews  The-One-and-the-Only-God/

Michael Svigel wrote on the 3rd part in his series of 10-reasons-to-learn-church-history

Alex Poulos on Origen-on-the-ages-to-come-pt-1/Part-2/ ; Part-3

Anthony Alcock on the Mysteries of the Greek Alphabet

Roger-Pearse on-the-satire-of-erasmus

Blair Wilner on Gregory-of-Nyssa’s-homilies

Elizabeth on Thomas Aquinas and Intellectual Disability

Elizabeth on Augustine, Forgiveness and Silver Linings Playbook

Patristic Views on the Nature and Status of Scientific Knowledge by Jean-Claude Larche

Bridget on Catherine Of Siena and Hope In the Storm Tossed Church

John Slattery of Daily Theology: A Mother’s Day Interview with Julian of Norwich

RodtRDH

Rod the Rogue Demon Hunter, Preacher of Hope | Black Scholar of Patristics | Writer for Nonviolent Politics. Destroyer of Trolls. It must be that angry puppy.

More Posts - Website - Twitter

Star Trek: Where No Man Has Gone Before

LITERALLY PUTTING THE MAN IN “NO MAN HAS GONE BEFORE”

225

The very first episode of  Star Trek: TOS to air was Where No Man Has Gone Before.
Like the unaired pilot before it, The Cage, Where No Man Has Gone Before, was driven by questions of gender and epistemology (how do human know things? Is it experience? Is it reason/logic?). Unfortunately, the approach to the sexes in this episode is very much watered down, compared to “The Cage” but sorta makes up for it with an opening scene that has a positive portrayal of Black men (though they don’t have any lines really). Hey, it’s better than most shows today, so, off to a good start diversity wise for TOS. What troubles me the most about this episode is the depiction of Dr. Elizabeth Dehner, who’s a doctor only in that she like a psychiatrist, talking to patients about their problems (reminiscent of TNG‘s Deanna Troi). Dehner is a strongish female character that gets turned into the goddess damsel in distress. When an accident transforms Captain James T. Kirk‘s friend, Lt. Commander Gary Mitchell into a telepath endowed also with telekinesis and superior strength, trouble ensues on the Enterprise as Mitchell wishes to eradicate all humans starting with his own crewmates.

Mitchell is placed into the science fiction trope of an evolved human who sees himself as divine. Mitchell argues that the world cannot exist with two races living side by side, so the weaker humans have to be eliminated. Mitchell’s dream of domination is explained while he is having lunch with Dr. Dehner, with the meal being an apple from a different planet. Roddenberry sticks to ripping off Genesis again (Adam and Eve in The Cage), and now a man and woman eating of the fruits, claiming of divine power. Mitchell and, for a while, Dehner, obsess over how self-important and glorious they are over and against homo sapiens. Kirk, who had argued with Spock earlier over a game of chess about the importance of emotion, contends that “every god needs compassion.” Mitchell the new god is defeated by force and human ingenuity because Kirk has very little choice. At the conclusion, Spock admits to learning emotion, and then Kirk responds, “there is hope for you yet.”

Within this episode, one can see a clear battle of ideas: who will the man of the future be? The MAN of Passion or the MAN OF Rationality? What about ways of being and knowing in the world that include a concept of community and the presence of the Other, specifically women? The division of logic and emotion is not the simple, the mind cannot be severed from the body, and vice versa. Or what about religious epistemologies, say, Christianity, that affirm the presence of the Spirit in the everyday lives of believers, many of whom are renowned thinkers? With these ideas in mind, I think it’s fair to say that Star Trek while being intended to be progressive on gender issues, takes a step back, returning to Where Many Men Have Gone Before.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

RodtRDH

Rod the Rogue Demon Hunter, Preacher of Hope | Black Scholar of Patristics | Writer for Nonviolent Politics. Destroyer of Trolls. It must be that angry puppy.

More Posts - Website - Twitter

Marginalized within the Marginalized – Thoughts on contemporary black culture & theology

A Guest Post

“Harry Samuels is a student at UNC Asheville majoring in Environmental Management & Policy. He’s also very much obsessed with this Jesus guy – his politics, religious sensibilities, and the implications his teachings have for existential reality. Having been born in sunny Charleston , SC and raised in verdant Richmond, VA, he has spent his life in the American South- where many less-than-flattering portrayals and ideas of Jesus seem to prevail. Still, though, he has managed to “hold on to what is good” and seeks to explore , find, and maximize the intersection that lies between following Christ, sustainability of this gem of a planet, and environmental ethics.”

image

Much of the talk that goes on within liberation theology involves such things as racial reconciliation and race politics – as it should. On a basic level, the endeavor of liberation theology (racial, gender, etc.) to set those free who have been oppressed mirrors Christ’s own ministry in his dealing with those who have been pushed to the fringes and have been “othered”- such is the point! When we think of those groups of people who have historically been margminalized and othered, it has been (most obviously) skin color/race and gender. So, specifically with African Americans, from the trans-Atlantic slave trade to the Jim-Crow laws & Civil Rights Era, it has been their being black that has been both the axis upon which they have been oppressed and the manner in which they grouped and assembled together in brother and sisterhood. Many reverends and clergymen of the black church ( i.e. Dr. King) began to see the implication and real thrust of Christ’s message for a group of people being marginalized for their skin. Of course, however, WITHIN this marginalized group- the axis of race, lies the axis of gender. We’ve all heard the adage, “you’ve already got two strikes against you- you’re black AND a woman”. This, of course, is something we see resonating to this day in such books as Keri Day’s Unfinished Business – where the reader is taught extensively the role of the black church in being a community of transcendence, refuge, and empowerment. Thus, many black churches , black clergymen, etc. responded to this and saw the real thrust of Christ’s ministry for a group of people who had been marginalized for both the color of their skin and their gender (See the parallel?).

I realize nothing I have said up until this point, is really all that earth-shattering/ground-breaking. However, what I am suggesting in setting up this parallel structure with the “axis of marginalization” , is to prove that we could come up with many different combinations within the black community. The title of this post containing the word, “contemporary” is to contrast those manners of marginilization which have been historically seen – racism and sexism. I am in NO WAY suggesting, however, that we are beyond this, America ( and all the world) is a far cry from being post-racial or post-misogynist. My point in bringing this up is that in all our effort to reconcile race and gender- there are more communities within the black community/church that are being “othered”. This is why I say “contemporary”. Within the black community you have those who are “othered” for their sexual orientation (homophobia in the black church is a topic of increasing concern, especially amongst black teens/youth), those who are “othered” for the fact that they’re not “black enough”(perhaps Blerds could fit into this category) –i.e. they speak proper and wear proper-fitting clothing ( this tends to be moreso within the contemporary black community as opposed to the church- where such behavior tends to looked upon favorably by black clergymen seeking to liberate blacks from academic oppression.), those who are “othered” for their complexion – (the brainless Team Lightskin vs. Team Darkskin “war”.) and many others I could spend all day listing and talking about.

Yes, being black has and continues to be a common point of oppression and insititutionalized racism. We must conintue to work towards racial reconciliation through black liberation theology. We must continue to work towards liberation of black women through Womanist theology. Much of the primary focus on racism and sexism often is born out of the especially malicious nature of those being oppressed because of being black and/or being a woman. Though, we should realize there are still other tremendous psychological burdens by other groups within the black community. All I am suggesting, is that we realize that the contemporary world has gotten increasingly complex in terms of relationships, means of communication and attitudes towards the church. Just as the black church was created out of neccessity from the racism of whites and their clergy, we shouldn’t be surprised to see something similar for other groups within the black community. The consequences we’ve seen often boil down to a forsaking of the faith in general and/or a distrust of black churches & black christians. Key to Christ’s ministry is stopping the vicious cycle since the dawn of human history of human beings being “othered”. Ensure that no one lies on the fringes.

I welcome/ would really like comments and feedback, a lot of this post is me thinking aloud!

Editor’s note: See Rod’s review of Keri Day’s Unfinished Business here.

The Political Jesus Collective

Guests posts by friends of Political Jesus ---OR---- Group Announcement from the Bloggers of PJ

More Posts - Website - Facebook

Happy T.U.L.I.P. Day!

Today is May 13th, and we celebrate T.U.LI.P. Day. John Calvin established the very first TULIP day in 1575 in commemoration of his doctrines of grace. It was to be the holiest of all holidays for the new Israel, Geneva, Switzerland to recognize.

Engraved from the original oil painting in the...

Engraved from the original oil painting in the University Library of Geneva, this is considered Calvin’s best likeness. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

.

Of course the preceding paragraph was made in jest, but this really is Tulip Day, just not the above mentioned. Apparently, the tulip is only the world’s third most popular flower.

Tulips

Tulips (Photo credit: Caro Wallis)

Enhanced by Zemanta

RodtRDH

Rod the Rogue Demon Hunter, Preacher of Hope | Black Scholar of Patristics | Writer for Nonviolent Politics. Destroyer of Trolls. It must be that angry puppy.

More Posts - Website - Twitter

Star Trek: The Cage

Star Trek TOS logo

Star Trek TOS logo (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

I grew up watching Star Trek: The Next Generation with my brothers every Saturday night before we had to wake up for church the next morning. I subsequently became the lone Deep Space Nine fanboy in our family (I pretended Voyager & Enterprise didn’t happen). Although I had seen many Star Trek: TOS episodes, I had never made a concerted effort to watch The Original Series all the way through. This is my attempt to do so, and I will try to blog out my thoughts about as many TOS episodes as I am able to.

The  unaired pilot episode for Star Trek: The Cage, is an exploration in the dynamics of gender roles. From the beginning, Lieutenant Number One, played by Majel Barrett (creator Gene Roddenberry’s wife), is described as being the second in command of the fleet, with the second most experience and credentials behind only Captain Christopher Pike. When Pike is captured by the telepathic, sinister Talosians, Number One is the person who leads a failed attempt to rescue him.  One other female character, yeoman J.M. Colt, stood in to represent an ideal youth during that era (I mean, the late 1960′s—although Star Trek takes place in the future).  Pike resists the Talosians attempts to mate him with Vina, a beautiful damsel in distress who promises Pike she can be “any woman he wants her to be.”

The Talosians dictate that the role of women is relegated to reproduction.  They are telepaths, and in science fiction, the trope of the telepath with an overgrown skull is an outgrowth of a particular vision of Western human agency, one of Eurocentric rationality, one that denies individual experience and subjectivity.  The Talosians allow Colt and Number One to dematerialize onto their planet, but only to give Pike more options. Colt is considered very young and filled with hormones, while the Talosians assure Pike that in spite of Number One’s high grade intelligence and lack of emotion, she still fantasizes about being with him. Number One figures out that Pike is to be “Adam” in this new Garden of Eden.  But who is to be the new Eve? That’s the question we are left with at the end.

I found it interesting that the Talosians punish Pike for having “wrong” thoughts about the second sex.  The Talosians were offended by the very notion that women could exist for more than just breeding.  It rings so familiar in both secular and religious circles, and the fact that a particular eroticized understanding of Eve and Adam’s story (where they are adults, not children) further demonstrates Roddenberry’s progressive vision of a future with the genders as equals.

The Cage (Star Trek: The Original Series)

The Cage (Star Trek: The Original Series) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Enhanced by Zemanta

RodtRDH

Rod the Rogue Demon Hunter, Preacher of Hope | Black Scholar of Patristics | Writer for Nonviolent Politics. Destroyer of Trolls. It must be that angry puppy.

More Posts - Website - Twitter