OH MAH NERD!: Perry White and Johnny Storm Have Been Cast As Black Men!

REVERSE RACEBENDING AND COMIC MOVIES

Image from MTV Splashpage

Image from Indie Wire

Racism is so awful, blah blah blah, institutional racism, white privilege, et cetera et cetera. So when I posted on how the Khan reboot of Star Trek Into Darkness was whitewashing, and how bad the practice actually is (the logic that defends it is racially biased and dehumanizing), there were questions on this blog and on other social networks about, what about “brownwashing” or “reverse racebending,” people of color being cast as traditionally white characters.

Well, going by the academic and socially accepted definition of racism: racism is racial prejudice plus power. That’s how institutional racism works. As culturally progressive as Hollywood sees itself, when it comes to race (you see the Academy awards?), studios, producers and creators are pretty backwards. In fact, for the most part, to the credit of fans of speculative and science fiction as well as fantasy, fans are way ahead of writers in this area. One example recently was the White Savior debacle on Game Of Thrones. Rather than take the opportunity to address diversity issues, George RR Martin chose to make sorry excuses (see linked) for the scene of Dany the Liberator! However, it really wasn’t POC geekdom that took Martin to task; most of the posts I read were from concerned white nerds and GoT fans.

Look, as long as comic book writers, artists, television directors and producers keep working on the WRONGHEADED assumption that #1, audiences will not buy media with POC as protagonists, #2, that POC are not consumers of their products, the institutional racism will continue to prevail. Now, for the cases of Perry White and Johnny Storm and Kingpin from Daredevil.

On Perry White: Perry White is a secondary character, he is there to build the character of Lois Lane and Clark Kent. I don’t know of any SupermanVerse that gives him any power or leverage like Peter Parker’s nemesis and boss J. Jonah Jameson. If I am wrong, please correct me. So, Lawrence Fishburne’s casting really wasn’t made into a big deal, and there really wasn’t a fuss over it ( a few worries, of course, but not due to the quality of actor on LF’s part). I think having a Black Perry White and a falsely rumored gender-bent Jenny/Jimmy Olson was part of the minor oppositional response to Man Of Steel’s casting. It wasn’t the case in the latter, so no worries. Too many changes, I know, can hurt a movie, but it didn’t. Larry Fishburne was the right age and body build for Perry, so, no biggie.

Image From MTV Splashpage

On The Kingpin in Daredevil 2003: The late Michael Clarke Duncan was casted as the Kingpin/Wilson Fisk in this movie. At the time, there wasn’t that much talk about it, since #1, Daredevil has a vocal but not that big cult following compared to X-Men and Spider-man, #2, Wilson Fisk is a larger than life character, and Michael Clarke Duncan, was almost 6’5 and was built like an offensive lineman for an American football team. Daredevil and its sequel Elektra were awful movies in the eyes of most critics not named me, but they have a special place in my heart for some reason. Duncan as Kingpin was sufficient but not even his decent performance could save these films from terrible writing and story telling.

So, we have in the first two instances, Michael Clark Duncan and Lawrence Fishburne, that these actors were chosen for how they were to going to embody the character they were cast.

On Johnny Storm for the To-Be-Determined Fantastic Four reboot: Without a doubt, 20th Century Fox’s two movies featuring the Fantastic Four in the 2000s were FLOPS. They were so terrible, fanboys will tell you that these movies ruined the Fantastic Four brand. No one complained when Jessica Alba, a Latina, was casted to play Sue Storm to be the sister of Chris Evans as Johnny Storm. Everyone did complain though when examining Alba’s acting performance in these two films (I am not one of those people, but I do admit, Chris Evans was the highlight of both movies, he was Johnny Storm, no question). I actually thought Ioann Gruffudd as Mr. Fantastic/Reed Richards was just atrocious and really, these films were horribly written, and sadly, the sequel also ruined the reputation of one of my personal favorites, the Silver Surfer. Just heartbreaking. But on the potential for Johnny Storm to be casted as a black guy, I really honestly could care less about the reboot if the reboot is with 20th Century Fox rather than Disney/Marvel because Fox doesn’t care about the brand at all. That being said, the potential for Jordan to be cast is more about getting this film into the headlines, for controversy, to make news. In other words, this casting decision is a form of tokenism, and quite unnecessary I might add. There are multiple versions of the Fantastic Four that are racially inclusive, specifically when they are under the leadership of T’Challa the Black Panther from Wakanda (a fictional African country). Now the producers are planning to change a major part of the Fantastic Four origin story just because they wanted attention. That’s exactly what tokenism is about: it’s about the majority maintaining power while feigning a concern for minorities being represented. This whole thing just does not sit well with me, and I hope others can see why.

So, to sum up what I have argued in this piece: diversity and the representation of POC is an important counter to the liberal white supremacy of Hollywood, however, tokenism is not acceptable, and quite problematic.

Enhanced by Zemanta

RodtRDH

Rod the Rogue Demon Hunter, Preacher of Hope | Black Scholar of Patristics | Writer for Nonviolent Politics. Destroyer of Trolls. It must be that angry puppy.

More Posts - Website - Twitter

Nat Turner: A Troublesome Property

The Confessions of Nat Turner

The Confessions of Nat Turner (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Today, I had the chance to watch Nat Turner: A Troublesome Property, and let me just say, this “documentary” is very problematic. It’s nice that we keep talking about the history of slave revolts and remember the legacy of the horrors of African enslavement on North American shores. The whole debate over the historical Nat Turner and whether or not he was insane is so filled with racial hypocrisy that it makes me sick. How come revolutionaries who just happen to be men of color such as Che Guevara, Malcolm x, Nat Turner, and Toussaint L’Ouverture are demonized or deemed crazy or too violent/murderous, while white geniuses like Christopher Columbus, John Calvin, and others have their sins surpassed only by their supposed “greatness.” The insanity plea is a luxury for the recent white domestic terrorists making the news, but it is placed as an insult for men of color who took up arms in self-defense. Why is the case?

Just something to think about.

Enhanced by Zemanta

RodtRDH

Rod the Rogue Demon Hunter, Preacher of Hope | Black Scholar of Patristics | Writer for Nonviolent Politics. Destroyer of Trolls. It must be that angry puppy.

More Posts - Website - Twitter

Justice. Wins.

The controversy of Rob Bell’s Love Wins has basically died down. It was a flash in the pan, nothing new to see here. Recent conversations on Twitter have me thinking about the “orthodox”/”heretic” divide. I’ll expand on writing my thoughts on that later. But part of the other problem I have with relational theologies of love is the lack of desire to discuss justice issues. It’s part of this heresy of “love is enough,” and rather than confront the status quo, these theologies would rather just mask matrices of oppression.

I’d recommend this piece by Richard Oster: the heresy of love is enough.

RodtRDH

Rod the Rogue Demon Hunter, Preacher of Hope | Black Scholar of Patristics | Writer for Nonviolent Politics. Destroyer of Trolls. It must be that angry puppy.

More Posts - Website - Twitter

Environmental Activism – do blacks care!?

A Guest Post

“Harry Samuels is a student at UNC Asheville majoring in Environmental Management & Policy. He’s also very much obsessed with this Jesus guy – his politics, religious sensibilities, and the implications his teachings have for existential reality. Having been born in sunny Charleston , SC and raised in verdant Richmond, VA, he has spent his life in the American South- where many less-than-flattering portrayals and ideas of Jesus seem to prevail. Still, though, he has managed to “hold on to what is good” and seeks to explore , find, and maximize the intersection that lies between following Christ, sustainability of this gem of a planet, and environmental ethics.”

One of the issues I have had to confront since the time I developed a passion for the environment is simply the lack of other minorities- mainly blacks – in the field/movement. As a teen in high school, I was a member of the ecology club my junior and senior year (and even served as president my senior year), but I was the sole black environmentalist in amongst a white environmental crowd. Although my school was majority white, black students still composed about a quarter of the school’s size ( about 2500 students!) I remember in my environmental science course reading all of these books by environmental greats – Rachel Carson, Jane Goodall, Al Gore ( well…), etc. – and though it was great to read about women who were leading the way in this arena, I still wondered where the black environmental heroes were. Surely there had to be some. Don’t we even care? Was I missing something?

There are many competing theories I have heard through the years to explain this apparent chasm in black involvement in environmental /sustainability issues. One of them being that blacks simply don’t have time to care. When you’re faced with institutionalized forms of racism and disadvantages, making ends meet and taking care of children- simply struggling to remain from being smothered by oppression, how could you possibly have any time to even be aware of environmental issues? A second competing theory I have heard as to the lack of black’s involvement in environmental activism is simply the fact that historically, blacks never “screwed around” with it, the way imperialist whites have. The cycle of the environment having been raped and pillaged by greed and empire is a cycle blacks did not ( were not permitted to) participate in…so why should they be held accountable for our environmental woes which are largely a product of a system they did not invent?

Consider the following from Dr. Kimberly K. Smith in African American Environmental Thought: “ Early twentieth century environmentalism had significant ideological and political connections to white supremacy: it is not purely coincidental that early preservationists included proponents of scientific racism such as Madison Grant and Henry Fairfield Osborn. That legacy has been hard to shake. Contemporary debates about population and immigration control among preservationists still rehearse Madison Grant’s fears about the nation’s landscape being submerged in a rising tide of color. In addition, the environmental movement has drawn criticism for distracting attention from antipoverty and other social justice causes, as well as for its failure to put people of color in leadership positions. Environmentalists, for their part, have complained that blacks aren’t interested in environmental politics, a claim resting on early studies of environmental attitudes suggesting that blacks have less concern for the environment than do whites.”

The lack of black’s involvement in environmental issues, then, seems to be a bit of a mix of the two theories I mentioned. Of course, as the above quote illustrates, it’s more complex than many realize. However, it strikes an interesting point – do blacks really NOT care? Or are the issues that they DO fight for (antipoverty , equality, etc.) qualify as other ecological issues? I know, I know…what am I talking about? Antipoverty an environmental issue? Well, I’d submit yes! It’s an environmental issue in that it recognizes the malaises of human ecology. The issue is that the “environmentalism” in that we have traditionally thought of the concept, seeks ecology in the midst of humanity, as opposed to the ecology OF humanity. We musn’t forget that human beings are, on a very basic level, animals. We are members of this biosphere just as much the birds and the trees. This division of human ecology from ecosystem ecology is one that I believe to be an unfortunate carryover from modern-era scientism. In the attempt to master and possess nature through math and science, they have found it valuable to leave humanity- unpredictable, uncertain humanity, out of the equation. What Dr. Smith (and many others are progressively realizing!) is that environmental issues and social justice issues are really two sides of the same coin. So by challenging social and economic injustices ..they really are a sort of environmental activists because they’re challenging the systems that are responsible for causing the environmental degradation – even if they aren’t addressing the specific issues. If it is human nature that is the ultimate root of our environmental woes, then it makes sense that challenging those parts of human nature that are ill and savage is a step in the right direction!

Dr. Smith further states ,
“To be sure, that activism looks different from the conservation and wilderness preservation campaigns of that era: it was generally local in focus and aimed at such issues as access to urban parks and other green spaces, combating urban pollution, and protecting public health. Moreover, black activists usually framed their concerns as civil rights issues. But they are civil rights issues based on the assumption that environmental amenities and freedom from environmental harms are critical to the good life and should be available to all – an assumption that informs the contemporary environmental justice movement as well. Indeed, its sudden emergence and rapid growth in the 1980s suggests that the environmental justice movement has deep roots in black politics and black political thought, reflecting long-standing concerns for civil rights activists”

So do blacks really care?…YES!!

The Political Jesus Collective

Guests posts by friends of Political Jesus ---OR---- Group Announcement from the Bloggers of PJ

More Posts - Website - Facebook

Michele Bachmann Set to Retire; Dominionism Still Repulsive

English: Marcus Bachmann with his wife Michele...

English: Marcus Bachmann with his wife Michele Bachmann at the 2011 Time 100 gala. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Minnesota Congresswoman Michele Bachmann decides that this will be her last term in office. Couldn’t be the fact that her campaign is under investigation. It’s well known that Bachmann believes in Dominionism, the idea that Christians should establish a dictatorship over the world. It’s an evil, heretical idea, and its source,  Rushdoony, is highly problematic.

Dominionists rely upon practices of spiritual abuse; its not surprising really, set up a Christian empire by first colonizing bodies in the church.

The problem is that–because dominionism is, at its core, a spiritually abusive movement with political aspirations it isn’t that simple at all…because you have to fight the programmed mindset.

I am posting this info in the hope that people–in particular, experts in the psychological field (I know we have at least one on the board!) will be able to give suggestions.  I also post this in the hope people realise the difficulty us walkaways have had in getting out–and maybe our success stories will give people hints on how to stop the hijacks from occuring.

One thing that is difficult to explain to people who have never been involved in a coercive religious group is just how people get “stuck in” and refuse to leave.

What people don’t tend to realise is that most coercive groups–be they dominionist groups or some other flavour of coercive group (such as Scientology, the Moonies, etc.)–have as part of the coercion in and of itself various “thought stopping” techniques and other forms of coercion that literally prevent the person from questioning the group at all.  (In fact, that’s how we can define dominionism as a coercive religious movement, especially in its “spiritual warfare” and “premillenarian dispensationalist” flavours.)

- DogEmperor at the Daily Kos: Why the subject of dominionism is rather personal to me

Enhanced by Zemanta

RodtRDH

Rod the Rogue Demon Hunter, Preacher of Hope | Black Scholar of Patristics | Writer for Nonviolent Politics. Destroyer of Trolls. It must be that angry puppy.

More Posts - Website - Twitter