NT Wright or James Cone?

Dr. James Cone at the 174th Convocation of Uni...

Image via Wikipedia

I prefer James Cone.

Dru Hart reports, you decide.

Enhanced by Zemanta

RodtRDH

Formerly known as Rod of Alexandria, Rod the Rogue Demon Hunter Preacher of Hope | Black Scholar of Patristics | Writer for Nonviolent Politics. Destroyer of Trolls. It must be that angry puppy.

More Posts - Website

About RodtRDH

Formerly known as Rod of Alexandria, Rod the Rogue Demon Hunter Preacher of Hope | Black Scholar of Patristics | Writer for Nonviolent Politics. Destroyer of Trolls. It must be that angry puppy.
This entry was posted in theology and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to NT Wright or James Cone?

  1. Brian LePort says:

    As I said on Dru’s blog, I think it depends on what is being addressed, but I really did like the line where he wrote, “…it is a modernist bias to think that a scholarly interpretation trumps the emotional and intuitive response of uneducated and marginalized people.” Great insight there.

  2. Pingback: Tweets that mention James Cone or NT Wright? Your thoughts: -- Topsy.com

  3. Optimistic Chad says:

    I would rather read, listen to, and talk with N.T. Wright. In short, I like him better. Nevertheless, I cannot escape from a point that Hart makes about theology being inherently better when done by people who emotionally connect with it from the margins. I suppose Cone once fit that bill. I am not so sure that he is marginalized so much anymore though.

  4. Ryan says:

    How about both and… or is Manicheanism being brought back into the church fold? ;)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>