Book Review: Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s Ethics

Unbeknownest to me when I began this past Monday’s ritual of Monastery Monday with a determination to finish Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s Ethics, that I would be be doing this review on the 105th commemoration of his birth.

Some Christians remember him as a  martyr, others a pastor, to others a theologian, and to many, a 20th century Church Father for the post-modern.  Perhaps behind the admiration for his work is, for a few, a desire for someone to look to as an exemplar during times of trouble.  Ethics is perhaps the most systematic and unambiguous text provided to the church from Bonhoeffer.  At times it reads polemical, but the audience must excuse Bonhoeffer’s frankness because he is trying to wrestle the local church in Germany away from the nasty grip of the Third Reich.  As someone called the ministry (both in the Church and Academy), I sympathize with those who view Bonhoeffer as a model pastor.  I would qualify at least my notion of Bonhoeffer’s pastorate, in light of his thoughts about the so called church/world dichotomy, to say that Bonhoeffer was a pastor to his mid-20th century German world. That is, beyond the doors of even the Confessing church, Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s lectures and sermons were prophetic oracles that invited Nazi Germany to the light of Christ.

Here are a few things I have learned sitting at the feet of Bonhoeffer:

1. A Christian ethic is not about knowing what is good and evil, but to discredit all forms of human wisdom which lay such claims.

2. Christ as Savi0r is neither a revolutionary or conformist, but Judge and Reconciler.  Bonhoeffer, much like a student of his Jurgen Moltmann, selects one passage and repeats it over and over to make his case.  In Bonhoeffer’s instance for this book, it is Colossians 1.

3. A Christian ethic begins with the notion that nothing is understandable outside the reality of Christ. This means that we do not own our “selves” per se any more, but that it is Christ who works in us as our self.

4. There are four mandates by which God desires human obedience, and within those four mandates, there is freedom: Labor, Government, Church, and Marriage. His view of the Government is quite unique in that he makes  a distinction between the state (which starts from below) and government (which finds its mission from above).  On the mandate called marriage, he does address singleness and celibacy, but since the work was unfinished, he was never able to complete his argument.

5. Lastly, I think that overall, this work proves that a Christian thinker can do theology constructively and re-formulate traditional doctrine, as Bonhoeffer did with Luther’s Two-Kingdom theory as well as justification by grace through faith, to address the prevailing moral issues of each generation.  I don’t think he would want it any other way.

Enhanced by Zemanta

RodtRDH

Formerly known as Rod of Alexandria, Rod the Rogue Demon Hunter Preacher of Hope | Black Scholar of Patristics | Writer for Nonviolent Politics. Destroyer of Trolls. It must be that angry puppy.

More Posts - Website

About RodtRDH

Formerly known as Rod of Alexandria, Rod the Rogue Demon Hunter Preacher of Hope | Black Scholar of Patristics | Writer for Nonviolent Politics. Destroyer of Trolls. It must be that angry puppy.
This entry was posted in books and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Book Review: Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s Ethics

  1. Pingback: Tweets that mention Book Review: Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s Ethics | Political Jesus -- Topsy.com

  2. Pingback: Bonhoeffer’s legacy: How much does martyrdom matter? | Near Emmaus

  3. Brian LePort says:

    Would Bonhoeffer have a type of “situational ethic” that is dependent upon trying to understand what God wants to be done in a specific place and time?

    • Rod of Alexandria says:

      Yes. I think he would, and he also suggested that no Christian had the right to judge the Christian ethic of another era. Im still thinking on that one.

  4. Brian LePort says:

    That is difficult. I can see the value of the caution, but I think it impedes reform of any type. When does one “era” end and another begin?

  5. Hello,

    the main aim of Bonhoeffer was not the resistance against Hitler, but the renewal of the German Evangelical Church (former DEK, today EKD). In Germany there are evil powers trying to turn and to fix publics gaze on Bonhoeffers resistance activity. Everybody must admit that the Third Reich is over and the EKD sill exists with her problems. It is high time to turn the gaze away from Bonhoeffers resistance activity to his activity as reformer of the Church. Assumed Bonhoeffer would be recognized as very gifted theologian and assumed his theology would be applyed the EKD had to change totally.

    I have just started a website concerning this issue:
    http://www.confessingchurch.wordpress.com

    Kind regards,
    Rainer Braendlein (Munich, Germany)

    The best book of Bonhoeffer: “The Cost of Discipleship” Buy it now!

    • Rod of Alexandria says:

      Indeed, I would agree but one cannot separate the German Evangelical church from the Aryan Christianity which took over it. His theology writes against this enculturation, which is an act of resistance

      But the renewal of the church was his goal, I will concede that point.

  6. Pingback: The Trinitarian Ethics of Minister Julia J. A. Foote | Political Jesus

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>