Comments on: Can the Subaltern Blog?: The problem of institutional sexism and the biblioblogs http://politicaljesus.com/2009/09/06/can-the-subaltern-blog-the-problem-of-institutional-sexism-and-the-biblioblogs/ Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:19:56 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: MyFave Five 2009 « Political Jesus: Journeys in Nonresistant Love http://politicaljesus.com/2009/09/06/can-the-subaltern-blog-the-problem-of-institutional-sexism-and-the-biblioblogs/#comment-916 MyFave Five 2009 « Political Jesus: Journeys in Nonresistant Love Thu, 31 Dec 2009 17:03:44 +0000 http://politicaljesus.wordpress.com/?p=480#comment-916 [...] Can the Subaltern Blog? [besides my  three "blaming the victim/playing the victim" posts, this one stirred a lot of [...] [...] Can the Subaltern Blog? [besides my  three "blaming the victim/playing the victim" posts, this one stirred a lot of [...]

]]> By: Rod http://politicaljesus.com/2009/09/06/can-the-subaltern-blog-the-problem-of-institutional-sexism-and-the-biblioblogs/#comment-869 Rod Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:25:59 +0000 http://politicaljesus.wordpress.com/?p=480#comment-869 Thanks, Impabbala. Hope to see you around. Thanks, Impabbala. Hope to see you around.

]]> By: impabbala http://politicaljesus.com/2009/09/06/can-the-subaltern-blog-the-problem-of-institutional-sexism-and-the-biblioblogs/#comment-868 impabbala Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:21:43 +0000 http://politicaljesus.wordpress.com/?p=480#comment-868 Wow loved reading your blogpost. I submitted your rss to my reader! Wow loved reading your blogpost. I submitted your rss to my reader!

]]> By: Rob Kashow http://politicaljesus.com/2009/09/06/can-the-subaltern-blog-the-problem-of-institutional-sexism-and-the-biblioblogs/#comment-464 Rob Kashow Mon, 07 Sep 2009 03:09:50 +0000 http://politicaljesus.wordpress.com/?p=480#comment-464 ummm, let's see... for the hundredth time, she has trampeled on all the men of the blogosphere and accused them of doing something without any demonstrable evidence. This for me makes her a chauvinist. And a conspiracy theorist because she thinks bibliobloggers are out to oppress women who wish to blog on biblical studies related issues. This is clear evidence, unlike April who has makes claims without evidence. ummm, let’s see… for the hundredth time, she has trampeled on all the men of the blogosphere and accused them of doing something without any demonstrable evidence. This for me makes her a chauvinist. And a conspiracy theorist because she thinks bibliobloggers are out to oppress women who wish to blog on biblical studies related issues.

This is clear evidence, unlike April who has makes claims without evidence.

]]> By: Rod http://politicaljesus.com/2009/09/06/can-the-subaltern-blog-the-problem-of-institutional-sexism-and-the-biblioblogs/#comment-463 Rod Mon, 07 Sep 2009 02:16:12 +0000 http://politicaljesus.wordpress.com/?p=480#comment-463 I have read your post on the matter. Still no excuse for accusing DeConick of being a chauvinist without any grounding whatsoever. What is in her work that makes her a chauvinist? That is the question that have many of your critics in an uproar, Rob, and the part about her being an angry feminist, holding some bitter grudge, that was too close to referring to an ugly stereotype. What evidence do you have that she is this way? You are making a character judgment of her without referring to her being consistently angry at men. There are no character judgments in my posts; I do not say, hey, this guy has this hidden anger in his heart towards women. What I said was this: hey, look at these pics this one blog put up, and look who agreed with the pics, and look what these pics represent: angry white women complaining about sexism. That is the difference. Truth and peace, Rod I have read your post on the matter. Still no excuse for accusing DeConick of being a chauvinist without any grounding whatsoever. What is in her work that makes her a chauvinist? That is the question that have many of your critics in an uproar, Rob, and the part about her being an angry feminist, holding some bitter grudge, that was too close to referring to an ugly stereotype. What evidence do you have that she is this way? You are making a character judgment of her without referring to her being consistently angry at men.

There are no character judgments in my posts; I do not say, hey, this guy has this hidden anger in his heart towards women. What I said was this: hey, look at these pics this one blog put up, and look who agreed with the pics, and look what these pics represent: angry white women complaining about sexism. That is the difference.

Truth and peace,
Rod

]]>