Moses as Fanon’s Colonized Intellectual: Wretched of the Earth and Exodus

Frantz Fanon, author of The Wretched of The Earth

Frantz Fanon, author of The Wretched of The Earth

So today for Leo Perdue’s Postcolonial Biblical Interpretation course, I presented on The Wretched of The Earth by Frantz Fanon and I came across some interesting points between Fanon’s concept of the colonized intellectual and the story of Moses.

1. Fanon argues first that :

The colonized intellectual has to assimilate to the ways of the colonizer and that this is most apparent in the colonized intellectual’s incapacity to engage in dialogue (page 13).

Go back to Moses in Exodus 4 where he is talking to the angel of YHWH. He says, “But  my Lord , I have never in the past  nor even now that you have spoken to your servant; but I am slow  of speech and slow of tongue.”-Exodus 4:10 (NRSV)

The conflict for Christians starts with the apostle Stephen’s rendering of Moses’s speaking eloquence in the Acts of the Apostles: “So Moses was instructed in all the wisdom of the Egyptians and was powerful in his words and deeds.” (Acts 7:22, NRSV).

The question becomes: is Moses unable to speak because he has a stuttering problem, for instance? Or, is Moses incapable of communicating with the oppressed Israelite elders because he has been educated by the Egyptians.  If we apply Fanon’s analysis to the text, I would say it is the latter.

2. Fanon continues, arguing for the contextual and communal nature of truth.

—  “Nobody has a monopoly on truth, neither the leader nor the militant.  The search for truth in local situations is the responsibility of the community”(139).

In the Exodus narrative, Pharaoh clearly believes he has a monopoly on the truth.  He orders the Hebrew midwives to work to reduce the number of infant males born to the Israelites due to the  Hebrew women extraordinary ability to breed (Exodus 1:19).  Also, Pharaoh tells the Israelite leaders to ignore the lies of  Moses and Aaron (who speaks for his younger brother), on the falsehood that the Hebrew people are “lazy” (Exodus 5:7-9 & 17-18).  Later in the story, Moses receives the Decalogue, of which Ninth commandment forbids the giving of false testimony and that includes the spreading of false reports or aiding the wicked be malicious witnesses (Exodus 20:16;23:1).  In this context, the midwives  (by resisting Pharaoh’s orders) are being truthful to themselves  as well as their oppressed community (a Fanonian concept) and to the law of God (even before it was revealed?).

3. Fanon also contends:

—  Mothers help the propaganda of nationalist parties by passing on stories of heroic warriors who died ages ago to their children by way of song (69).

—  As the revolution gets under way, the banner is waving in the air, the activity of the peasants frightens the colonialists, and the women cheer on the men headed to fight in guerilla warfare (70).

If one examines the song of Miriam the prophetess, one would recognize this Fanonian truth in the Exodus story as well.

Then the prophet Miriam, Aaron’s sister, took a tambourine in her hand; and all the women went out after her with tambourines and with dancing. And Miriam sang to them: “Sing to the Lord, for he has triumphed gloriously; horse and rider he has thrown into the sea.” –Exodus 15:20-21 (NRSV).

—  YHWH is the new hero of Israel, along with Moses.  Miriam, like the women in Fanon’s revolutionary ideal, expresses the beginning of a new heroic story to be repeated down to the generations as the nation of Israel is coming into existence.

4. Lastly, there is a small contrast in the Exodus tradition and Fanon’s recommendations for revolution.

In the 1950s and 1960s, it was the trend of the United Nations to encourage the Western nations to withdraw from their colonies.  The colonialists would withdraw, leaving the the nations in hellish states of starving and impoverished populations as the newly independent nations would call on their citizens to do the impossible (54).  Fanon recommended moral reparations for the colonized nations since the colonizers benefited economically from the colony’s resources.  In stark contrast, it seems that the Egyptians, without hesitation, gave the Hebrew people silver, gold, and clothing as reparations.  An interesting variation, indeed.

—
—

Truth and Peace,
Rod

5 Responses to “Moses as Fanon’s Colonized Intellectual: Wretched of the Earth and Exodus”

  1. Mike Koke Says:

    Thanks for this Rod. I have read some other big forerunners of postcolonial criticism (e.g. Edward Said, Homi Bhabha) but I definitely need to read Frantz Fanon. By the way, I have tagged you in the latest meme on 5 influential female scholars.

    • Rod Says:

      I need to finish Said’s Orientalism. Been working through it.

      Fanon is a genius, if you ignore/refute his calls to armed revolution.

      I’m just totally digging your meme.

      :)

  2. Antony Solomon Says:

    I have just read Fanon’s book. It was recommened because of Sartre’s introduction on liberal humanist racism which is again raising it’s ugly head in the UK. The book is brilliant, a totally non-dualist, non them-and-us analysis of colonialism, anti-colonialism, independance, and the Empire-strikes-back. His analysis of the different groups, and how they make alliances, or are duped into doing so, was very effective. And guess what. No one learned the lessons.

    • Rod Says:

      You are correct, Antony, on all counts.

      I am guessing that from your response on Mike’s and my posts, that you consider yourself in the post-colonial studies camp?

      Thanks for stopping by.

      • Antony Solomon Says:

        Post colonial studies as such are new to me. i have a couple of books that are rated academically, and I’ve just read Fanon. It’s more the fact that when you start thinking in a certain way, you see how it applies elsewhere. Liberation Theology of the Latin American type deals with existence under the Empire. After that comes the question of what happens when the Empire falls, and the colonials come to live in the house next door! Equally, what is the relationship of the former colonial powers to those they once ‘ruled’? Look at the way Mugabe keeps throwing colonialism in the UK governments face. That’s what I mean when I say no one learned the lessons. I know Zimbabweans who think the blacks never had it so good, for a start.
        One of the keys is that a true Liberation Theology must remind us to love the oppressor.


Leave a Reply